Every client invoice is a small investment in our product
We've had investors since day one. They just never asked for equity. How 300 € and client invoices paid for every product we've built.
Leer más →The question I get once a product starts to exist is always the same: when are you raising? My answer is less exciting than people hope.
The moment you have a product, there's a question waiting for you.
"So, when are you raising?"
As if a product were a ticket to a queue, and the queue led to investors.
We're building our own software for sports clubs, paid for by agency work. It's slow. It's real. And saying there's no round planned feels, in startup terms, a bit like announcing you're walking to Madrid.
Which, to be fair, is roughly what we're doing.
I'm not against investors. I'm against misunderstanding what they sell.
From the outside, a round looks like time. Money in the bank, months of runway, no more fixing client websites at night to pay for the product.
But I don't think money from investors buys you time. It sets a clock.
From the day the money arrives, there's a date. A date by which you have to show growth, raise again, or explain why not. Every decision gets measured against that date. Not "is this right for the people using it?" but "will this look good before the next round?".
That's not evil. It's the deal. But it's a deal, and I'd rather know what I'm signing.
A funding round doesn't buy you time. It puts a clock on the wall.
Client money is different. It's slow, and it doesn't care what we do with it.
A club pays because the tool solves its problem. A client pays because their website works. Nobody asks where we'll be in eighteen months. Nobody needs us to be the biggest.
That gives us something I value more than speed: choice.
The choice to say no to a feature that would look good in a pitch but nobody asked for. The choice to stay small in a niche we understand. The choice to get something wrong, quietly fix it, and move on without a board meeting about it.
I'd call it the right to make mistakes without explaining them. It sounds small. I think it's most of what freedom means in a company.
I won't pretend this is the clever path. It's the slow one.
Someone with funding will probably build faster. Hire more. Maybe even build something in our space before we finish ours. That's the price, and I've accepted it.
What I haven't accepted is that being small means being unserious. A company that pays its bills, grows on what customers give it and answers to nobody but its founders and its clients isn't a startup that failed to raise. It's just a company.
The startup world won't count it. That's fine. I'm not building it for the startup world.
So, when are we raising?
When it's the only way to keep choosing. Not before.
P.S. If you're an investor and you've read this far: thank you. Truly. You're very welcome to become a client.